In article <E0zfUWw-0007KA-00@danube.inka.de>,
olaf@bigred.inka.de (Olaf Titz) writes:
>> For extremely shitty networks (I mean here, every other packet always
>> dropped etc.), delayed acks are worse than non-delayed ones. But as
>> you mention it contributes to congestion and degrades performance for
>> people with at least half-way decent connectivity.
> This clearly marks it as a sysctl candidate.
It is already settable:
setsockopt(sk, SOL_TCP, TCP_NODELAY, ((int *){1}), sizeof int);
Last time I checked that controls the Nagle algorithm, it doesn't
control delayed ACKs at all.
Later,
David S. Miller
davem@dm.cobaltmicro.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/