Re: [patch] delayed acks decrease performances in congestioned networks
Olaf Titz (olaf@bigred.inka.de)
Mon, 16 Nov 1998 20:41:45 +0100
> For extremely shitty networks (I mean here, every other packet always
> dropped etc.), delayed acks are worse than non-delayed ones. But as
> you mention it contributes to congestion and degrades performance for
> people with at least half-way decent connectivity.
This clearly marks it as a sysctl candidate.
Olaf
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/