18 * 30 / 100 = 5.4 months, actually.. :)
I have to agree with you there, except for little snippets of code. If
you can get a localized 30% speed improvement here, and another 30% there,
you end up with a faster kernel without trading in kernel "openness" since
all the changes are well encapsulated.. IMHO, of course.
-- ____/| Ragnar Hojland (ragnar@lightside.ddns.org) Fingerprint 94C4B \ o.O| _______________________________________________ 2F0D27DE025BE2302C =(_)= | 7 Diciembre, manifestacion contra Telefonica! | 104B78C56 B72F0822 U | No faltes!! http://www.internautas.org/7D/) | hkp://keys.pgp.com -----------------------------------------------
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/