Re: 2.1.126 still no sparc64 autofs

Rich Sahlender (rsahlen@voicenet.com)
Sat, 14 Nov 1998 13:45:16 -0500 (EST)


H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>
> Why is the "long" a different size in kernel and user space? That
> seems buggy. It's an easy thing to fix, but it seems like the Wrong
> Thing[TM].

I tend to agree it's buggy. I would expect the long to generate a 32
bit int even in the 64 bit kernel space unless you specifically ask
for a 64 bit long .ie. suns 'long long'. This would keep things
downward/backward compatible.

>
> Changing that to "int" would be just fine, *except* it would break the
> protocol for all other platforms.
>

I was going to provide a patch to do something like this, but unless I
misunderstood Alan I think he said there are ioctl's which can be used
to convert the 64 bit structs while passing to 32 bit user space. I'm
getting lost finding them though...

Anyway, I guess this is only a problem while were're still limited to
32 bit user space with 64 bit kernels.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/