Re: Linux 2.1.125 doesn't dump core on SIGSEGV

Chris Wedgwood (chris@cybernet.co.nz)
Thu, 12 Nov 1998 11:12:20 +1300


On Wed, Nov 11, 1998 at 10:59:47PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:

> Its extremely dangerous to do so. Lots of packages do build time
> checks for sane symlink behaviour and cope accordingly. O_NOFOLLOW
> is pretty much unique to Linux and FreeBSD in the mainstream.

But removing this `arbitrary restriction' early in 2.3.x will give
people plenty of time to fix the applications that might be affected.

Its not a huge issue, I just think that we should have as few
arbitrary special rules as possible.

Oh, and if Linux and FreeBSD have O_NOFOLLOW, then thats a good chunk
of the main-stream.

-cw

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/