Re: [PATCH] Compilation fixes for 2.1.127

Henner Eisen (eis@baty.hanse.de)
Tue, 10 Nov 1998 16:57:25 +0100


>>>>> "Andi" == Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de> writes:
>> Is dst_link_failure() intended to be a public interface?

Andi> Yes. icmp_send on the other hand isn't: it is only supposed
Andi> to be called from IPv4, it doesn't work with IPv6, it is a
Andi> layer violation.

Yes. I was just wondering whether this is the proper way for net device
drivers to signal link failures. As the link failure detected by the device
affects all attached network protocol stacks, would it make sense to
handle this event by means of a dedicated netdevice notifier?

Henner

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/