Re: why umsdos?

Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk (qrczak@knm.org.pl)
Mon, 9 Nov 1998 23:46:38 +0100 (CET)


On Mon, 9 Nov 1998, Riley Williams wrote:

> That's why I suggested using VFAT as the underlying file system rather
> than MSDOS - it eliminates that routine completely since VFAT can
> already handle long filenames, so doesn't need it.

But VFAT can't store filenames differing only in case or containing some
strange characters, so some translation is needed anyway.

I would use UMSDOS-over-VFAT instead of pure VFAT if it was compatible
with VFAT. Then when I run out of space on Linux partitions, I could
quickly create a symlink to an umssynced directory on VFAT partition and
move something there, without breaking ownerships, symlinks etc.

-- 
 __("<   Marcin Kowalczyk * qrczak@knm.org.pl http://qrczak.home.ml.org/
 \__/       GCS/M d- s+:-- a21 C+++>+++$ UL++>++++$ P+++ L++>++++$ E->++
  ^^                W++ N+++ o? K? w(---) O? M- V? PS-- PE++ Y? PGP->+ t
QRCZAK                  5? X- R tv-- b+>++ DI D- G+ e>++++ h! r--%>++ y-

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/