> Either way, the probgram is still flawed as a benchmark of any sorts as
> Linux could allow the process to run to the point where it calls sleep()
> as soon as it forks where FreeBSD may just continue to let the parent
> execute and kill the children (which is obviously going to make the
> program exit faster).
I ran it on a 2.0 system with QNX schedular patch. It did 254 in 0
seconds.. I then tried 10000 and it killed init.. :)
Damn.. The box had like 150days uptime.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/