Re: Schedule idle
yodaiken@chelm.cs.nmt.edu
Mon, 9 Nov 1998 06:51:24 -0700 (MST)
>
> On Nov 08, yodaiken@chelm.cs.nmt.edu wrote:
>
> > Spell out what "important RT" means precisely and you will be in a position
> > to make your code work. If you want a completely preemptable kernel, you
> > have your work cut out for you. God alone knows what it means for a
> > high priority RT task to "use the FS".
>
> my original feature request (which was solved for us by Ingo's SCHED_IDLE)
> was to run background jobs (esp. `rc5' that time) which shall _not_
> (or only very minimally) compete with other running tasks, even with
> nive-19 tasks (because we're using NQS/LSF style batch jobs which are
Why can't you run those tasks at nice 18?
> --
> All SCSI disks will from now on ___ _____
> be required to send an email notice 0--,| /OOOOOOO\
> 24 hours prior to complete hardware failure! <_/ / /OOOOOOOOOOO\
Inspiring policy.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/