Re: [PATCH] Patch to Memory Subsystem ... (Needed?)

Brian Schau (bsc@fleggaard.dk)
Sat, 07 Nov 1998 13:49:38 +0100

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Richard Gooch: "Re: timeouts with ncr53c8xx"
Previous message: Gerard Roudier: "Re: timeouts with ncr53c8xx"
Maybe in reply to: Brian Schau: "[PATCH] Patch to Memory Subsystem ... (Needed?)"
Next in thread: Michael Talbot-Wilson: "Re: Comments on Microsoft Open Source document"
Reply: Michael Talbot-Wilson: "Re: Comments on Microsoft Open Source document"

Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
>
> On Sat, 7 Nov 1998, Brian Schau wrote:
>
> >If I am wrong, please educate me! But no flames, please ...
>
> You are not wrong in the idea. The point is that if you would have used
> pre-2.1.127-7 instead of 2.1.1xx _probably_ you have not thought about
> this issue.
>
> Andrea Arcangeli

Have things changed significantely in 2.1.127 wrt. memory-issues?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Richard Gooch: "Re: timeouts with ncr53c8xx"
Previous message: Gerard Roudier: "Re: timeouts with ncr53c8xx"
Maybe in reply to: Brian Schau: "[PATCH] Patch to Memory Subsystem ... (Needed?)"
Next in thread: Michael Talbot-Wilson: "Re: Comments on Microsoft Open Source document"
Reply: Michael Talbot-Wilson: "Re: Comments on Microsoft Open Source document"