if this is a optional feature (even a compile-time option) this is fine.
for small systems (read embedded, NC's , etc) 1MB may be a problem.
David Lang
On Fri, 6 Nov 1998, Brian Schau wrote:
> Date: Fri, 06 Nov 1998 22:01:17 +0100
> From: Brian Schau <bsc@fleggaard.dk>
> To: Riley Williams <rhw@bigfoot.com>
> Cc: Meelis Roos <mroos@tartu.cyber.ee>, linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Patch to Memory Subsystem ... (Needed?)
>
> [ ... snip ... ]
> R
> >
> > True, but the question's a serious one all the same. Just how LITTLE
> > memory can root get away with to be able to log in, find the rogue
> > processes, and kill one or two of them to free up memory?
>
> Hard to say. But with ram being cheap these days, who can't afford a
> spare 1Mb?
> (Which i think should be sufficient?)
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0
Charset: noconv
iQEVAwUBNkN+YT7msCGEppcbAQG6fAf8CfenHYXAyveZ3qdcBKXdgRx82AvtBT5z
QxYCmlY15k0fDM8fvr2dKRFlZ92tUg6kl/NorTbpuCPG2cdxAfjNGcwIaRWvWoar
lfENfBf6mrvhFb55DBbwQ2UNru4pGIJVP+km5Ws2qggVO+2EK/C7RKneLwYah0PS
5c1EcWwMCYMCE4nHuWGqkMPp22YF53XY/N1GCgbQqyAjKFEcLj8F+Gd9oQ4LqTjC
EaHCa32N5v9/nxM2XwjTBwgkPL9xP4zmjh7GAOx+Rb7dLVAUObg/NLj9Hbo2FzDu
SjDlROb6k4mpwUYxvtLWdSHMRiWXY8E75m11lCY3rdJhEn4BawiGIw==
=pjIC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/