Well, my first thought is cache control. Bypassing the fs means avoiding
unnecesary readahead that would pollute the disk cache, and being able to
specify their own cache policies. Of course if something fails, there's
no e2fsck..
-- ____/| Ragnar Hojland (ragnar@lightside.ddns.org) Fingerprint 94C4B \ o.O| 2F0D27DE025BE2302C =(_)= "Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer for 104B78C56 B72F0822 U chaos and madness await thee at its end." hkp://keys.pgp.com
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/