>Even if not stated so, I think the 'next' field shall be considered as
>part of timer implementation not available to applications. We may call
Also using timer->expires directly would not be a good high level c++
implementation. Gerard, do a c++ port of the linux kernel and I' ll agree
with you. Right now my patch fix a _real_ C bug in C. I can agree that it
would be better to use a bit more high level function (as I' ll do now and
thanks for the suggestion) but I am very more worried to fix a real bug in
a obvious simple and __safe__ way.
Andrea Arcangeli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/