Re: My thoughts on egcs+2.2 (do you care??)

Ragnar Hojland Espinosa (ragnar@redestb.es)
Thu, 29 Oct 1998 00:18:15 +0100 (CET)

On Wed, 28 Oct 1998, Horst von Brand wrote:
> Fact is, gcc/egcs needs to evolve. It has been stagnating way too long as
> things stand, IMHO. Sure, software will get hurt. Particularly software
> that was written very closely to the working (not documentation!) of

Well, since we are talking about egcs and gcc.. does anyone have an idea
of the reason for the size increase in executables on IA?

int main() {return 0;} (stripped)

gcc 2.7.2.3 2146 bytes
gcc 2.8.1 6168 bytes
ecc 1.1 8752 bytes

-- 
____/|  Ragnar Hojland  (ragnar@lightside.ddns.org)      Fingerprint  94C4B
\ o.O|                                                   2F0D27DE025BE2302C
 =(_)=  "Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer for      104B78C56 B72F0822
   U     chaos and madness await thee at its end."       hkp://keys.pgp.com






-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/