Re: Linux 2.1.125 doesn't dump core on SIGSEGV

Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Tue, 27 Oct 1998 21:44:13 +0000 (GMT)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: MM with fragmented memory"
Previous message: Mike A. Harris: "Re: ARMS WAVING!!! Proposal to fix /proc dainbrammage."

> The big downside to this is that the user only gets one coer file, the
> upside is that this reduces the amount of wasted disk space.
>
> I dont expect this to ever be implemented in Linux, but I always thought
> it was a cool idea.

Its a nice solution. I still miss the approach some non unix platforms have
where when the program takes the fatal exception its frozen and dumped under
the debugger

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: MM with fragmented memory"
Previous message: Mike A. Harris: "Re: ARMS WAVING!!! Proposal to fix /proc dainbrammage."