Re: 2.2.0 and egcs 1.1 was Re: Sorry, wrong gcc-version

Bernhard Rosenkraenzer (linux@microsoft.sucks.eu.org)
Tue, 27 Oct 1998 20:33:48 +0100 (CET)


On Mon, 26 Oct 1998, Pete Chown wrote:

> > In short, if you want to play safe stay with 2.7.2.3 for kernel
> > compilation.
>
> If this is necessary, could I suggest including a test in the Makefile
> which refuses to build on other gcc versions?

I don't think that's a good idea... I'd rather make that a warning
message. There are people who don't need to play safe; I've been using
pgcc-compiled 2.1.x kernels for ages without problems.

As long as you use -O2 or lower, pgcc and egcs seem to work well even for
compiling the kernel.

LLaP
bero

-- 
Windows 98 supports real multitasking - it can boot and crash simultaneously.
***
Anyone sending unwanted advertising e-mail to this address will be charged
$25 for network traffic and computing time. By extracting my address from
this message or its header, you agree to these terms.

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/