a) problem is solved already; only 2.0.35 and lower can't correctly
detect > 64M of RAM
> 2.) How is it that Microsoft is able to deal with this
> without a bootloader option, and we can't?
this simply is not true; I have a friend with a system board that has
128M of ram on, and WinNT 4.0 (with all the patches) only recongizes
64M.
MS's reply?
It's the bios, or the system board. Upgrade!
Thomas
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/