Re: SMP=1 and Cyrix 6x86

Gregory Maxwell (linker@z.ml.org)
Thu, 15 Oct 1998 18:32:03 -0400 (EDT)


On Thu, 15 Oct 1998, Matthias Andree wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 14, 1998 at 04:00:58PM +1000, Warwick Mitchell wrote:
> > I seem to remember Linus saying that it is SMP by default only for his
> > own convenience and that it would be commented out for 2.2
>
> Maybe there should be (|x|menu)config menu item "SMP symmetric
> multiprocessor support" - if that's not possible, I suggest to create
> one in spite of that which actually only checks the correct SMP state
> in the Makefile and if it's incorrect, it issues an appropriate error
> message and aborts the make process.
>
> The former way would look more "professional" however, though the
> latter would at least help upgraders find the correct switches so they
> do not need to flood mailing lists and newsgroups with the same
> question over and over again.

I think the issue was something like SMP=1 touches almost every source
file. So putting it in .config would cause massive recompliation. Perhaps
it would be better to just have the dialog scripts view and edit the
makefile, then it would be the same as the user doing it..

On this note, has there been official word that RedHat will make SMP an
install option?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/