Re: [PATCH] scheduler patch, faster still

Michael L. Galbraith (mikeg@weiden.de)
Mon, 28 Sep 1998 23:31:51 +0200 (CEST)


On Mon, 28 Sep 1998, Larry McVoy wrote:

> "Michael L. Galbraith" <mikeg@weiden.de>:
> : > Do you have a result with an instrumented schedule()? If not, why not?
> :
> : These are from a fully instrumented kernel. (and with Rik's patch)
>
> [results deleted]
>
> Umm, unless I'm being dense, there isn't any way I can make sense from
> those results. In order for them to be meaningful, I'd need to see an
> instrumented kernel without the changes vs an instrumented kernel with
> the changes for varying run queue depths.

The point was.. if hard numbers from an instrumented kernel (sample) are
useful, they are available.

-Mike

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/