>. We've pointed him at a benchmark that doesn't have the same problems.
That one has other problems: it has nothing to do with real-time.
In his case, processes can starve. The starvation makes his efforts
interesting.
Perhaps you could point him at a benchmark with real-time processes.
>. His defense is completely unreasonable, both from a statistical
> point of view (consider his standard deviation)
So he needs to run it longer. No problem.
>. While it would be nice for Richard if someone dissected his benchmark,
> the people who can have already pruned that branch of the tree as
> uninteresting, i.e., no payoff.
No payoff UNLESS you run real-time processes.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/