Re: STREAMS: interface versus implementation

Mike Jagdis (mike@roan.co.uk)
Tue, 22 Sep 1998 14:56:16 +0100 (GMT/BST)


On Sun, 20 Sep 1998, Chris Wedgwood wrote:

> On Sun, Sep 20, 1998 at 05:22:38AM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > Although, I think we are still waiting on _necessary_ uses of
> > > STREAMS other than Netware aren't we?
> >
> > You shouldnt be suprised by that 8)
>
> Actually - I am a little.

You shouldn't be. Most vendors quietly bypassed the STREAMS stack
for TCP/IP by allowing calls straight into the underlying provider
modules for socket operations. If you really want a laugh trace
the system calls that a typical libnsl generates for a simple
TLI/XTI connect or listen/accept operation. It's, ah, "impressive" :-).

Mike

-- 
.----------------------------------------------------------------------.
|  Mike Jagdis                  |  Internet:  mailto:mike@roan.co.uk   |
|  Roan Technology Ltd.         |                                      |
|  54A Peach Street, Wokingham  |  Telephone:  +44 118 989 0403        |
|  RG40 1XG, ENGLAND            |  Fax:        +44 118 989 1195        |
`----------------------------------------------------------------------'

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/