> Is there any current reason that the shared memory tables (the ulong per
> page) can't be vmalloc() instead of kmalloc()'d. Its a small change to
> allow support for much bigger shared memory areas that the price of RAM
> makes eminently reasonable.
If this would be possible it would be a big win!
BTW. Is there a possibility to change the fixed id/page partitioning
scheme? THis would make it possible to have many small segments and
one or a few big ones.
Cheers
Christoph
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/