Re: REQUEST for /proc/cpuinfo copies & a baby bugbear :o(

Philip Blundell (philb@gnu.org)
Tue, 22 Sep 1998 00:48:26 +0100

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Theodore Y. Ts'o: "Re: Today Linus redesigns the networking driver interface (was Re: tulip driver in ...)"
Previous message: Vladimir Dergachev: "More file descriptors are needed"
Next in thread: Alex Buell: "Re: REQUEST for /proc/cpuinfo copies & a baby bugbear :o("
Reply: Alex Buell: "Re: REQUEST for /proc/cpuinfo copies & a baby bugbear :o("
Reply: Gregory Maxwell: "Re: REQUEST for /proc/cpuinfo copies & a baby bugbear :o("

>How about "you elitist 680x0 users won't be able to (directly) use programs
>which work fine on all the other architectures because you are gratuitously
>incompatible"?

There are a finite number of architectures. It doesn't seem like a big deal
to be able to deal with each individually if need be.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Theodore Y. Ts'o: "Re: Today Linus redesigns the networking driver interface (was Re: tulip driver in ...)"
Previous message: Vladimir Dergachev: "More file descriptors are needed"
Next in thread: Alex Buell: "Re: REQUEST for /proc/cpuinfo copies & a baby bugbear :o("
Reply: Alex Buell: "Re: REQUEST for /proc/cpuinfo copies & a baby bugbear :o("
Reply: Gregory Maxwell: "Re: REQUEST for /proc/cpuinfo copies & a baby bugbear :o("