Re: encrypted IP tunnel for 2.1?

Felix von Leitner (leitner@math.fu-berlin.de)
Tue, 22 Sep 1998 00:54:00 +0200

> > I mean, 2.0 already is obsolete and will be really obsolete when 2.2
> > comes out, so I don't understand why the implementors aren't already
> > writing their code for 2.1.
> Perhaps because you aren't paying them to do you a 2.1.x version.

I don't pay them for their 2.0.x version, too, and they write it
anyway. This was not a "fuck them, I want IPsec now" posting, it was a
simple question phrased as remark.

> > Is there any encrypting IP tunnel for 2.1 out there that I missed?
> Not as a far as I know. The actual code changes aren't trivial although
> you can probably steal the recipe by comparing the 2.0.x/2.1.x shaper
> and non encrypting tunnels

Right now, I'm spending my time writing a database and an online
brokerage system for a bank which I hope to release under GPL.

I will rather contribute code where I'm good than where I'm mediocre or
bad. And right now I can't say that I'm good at Linux network code.

Felix

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/