Re: AVL and hash in memory management

David Holland (dholland@cs.toronto.edu)
Sun, 20 Sep 1998 14:34:59 -0400

> | `ash' is available is much faster in many cases.
>
> But it won't run many of the scripts that come with Red Hat or Slackware
> --- I've tried it. They both assume that /bin/sh is bash in all its
> g(l)ory.

Ideally, the right thing to do is file a patch and bug report on every
script that ought to be #!/bin/bash. But I know this is a pain.

How current is the linux port of ash with respect to the current *bsd
versions?

-- 
   - David A. Holland             | (please continue to send non-list mail to
     dholland@cs.utoronto.ca      | dholland@hcs.harvard.edu. yes, I moved.)


     Any netkit mail should be sent to netbug@ftp.uk.linux.org, not me.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/