Re: Treat UDI like STREAMS ?

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru: "Re: Today Linus redesigns the networking driver interface (was Re: tulip driver in ...)"
• Previous message: Gregory Maxwell: "Re: Linux, UDI and SCO."
• In reply to: Jim Freeman: "Treat UDI like STREAMS ?"

> Alan writes:
> > Im not interested in UDI ...
>
> Perhaps the kernel could treat UDI like it treats STREAMS - not
> included in the kernel sources proper, but has the hooks to
> accommodate the UDI framework as a loadable module? So UDI
> would be available to those with a distinct need, but not the
> officially sanctioned "Linux Way (tm)".

How about a UDI-loader module? That is, it is a module that loads UDIs
drivers into the system. Then I can simply say 'N' to never build it. ;o)

Cheers,
Alex

--
 /\_/\  Legalise cannabis now! 
( o.o ) Grow some cannabis today!
 > ^ <  Peace, Love, Unity and Respect to all.

http://www.tahallah.demon.co.uk - *new* - rewritten for text browser users!

Linux tahallah 2.1.122 #43 Sat Sep 19 10:54:36 EDT 1998 One AMD 486 DX/4 processor, 49.77 total bogomips, 32M RAM


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru: "Re: Today Linus redesigns the networking driver interface (was Re: tulip driver in ...)"
• Previous message: Gregory Maxwell: "Re: Linux, UDI and SCO."
• In reply to: Jim Freeman: "Treat UDI like STREAMS ?"