Then the response is the same as it every was... Then we will use
someone elses board... Someone else supplied specs... Someone else has
native drivers to which we have the source... Why should we use your
crummy board and your buggy drivers when we have something better.
In other words... Use market demand to force them just like we
do now. It may be a little tougher if they already have a UDI driver
to answer back with but then we can hit them with: "Would you rather give
us the specs and have a community supported open source driver to sell
your board, or would you like to have everyone and their brother hammering
you over your closed source, buggy, inefficient driver?"
I do agree that this may more be a ploy to leverage our body of
drivers against the close source OS's but... Even if Linux supports UDI
drivers, who say WE have to write ONLY to that spec? :-)
Mike
-- Michael H. Warfield | (770) 985-6132 | mhw@WittsEnd.com (The Mad Wizard) | (770) 925-8248 | http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/ NIC whois: MHW9 | An optimist believes we live in the best of all PGP Key: 0xDF1DD471 | possible worlds. A pessimist is sure of it!- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/