Physical memory versus detected memory

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Ben McCann: "Re: NFS Data CORRUPTION Between Linux and SunOS 5.5.1"
• Previous message: Michal Jankowski: ""nfs_refresh_node: inode number mismatch""
• Next in thread: Gary Simmons: "Re: Physical memory versus detected memory"
• Maybe reply: Gary Simmons: "Re: Physical memory versus detected memory"
• Maybe reply: Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH: "Re: Physical memory versus detected memory"

I hav a Pentium 60 machine in the office which has 32MB RAM
plugged into it. At bootup time, the BIOS counts all the way upto
32MB. But linux (2.0.34 :RedHat) detects only 14 MB memory. I tried
loading NT on it, and it also only detects 14MB memory. What could be
the problem here?

Kenneth

--
There is no such thing as luck. 'Luck' is nothing but an absence of bad luck.




-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Ben McCann: "Re: NFS Data CORRUPTION Between Linux and SunOS 5.5.1"
• Previous message: Michal Jankowski: ""nfs_refresh_node: inode number mismatch""
• Next in thread: Gary Simmons: "Re: Physical memory versus detected memory"
• Maybe reply: Gary Simmons: "Re: Physical memory versus detected memory"
• Maybe reply: Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH: "Re: Physical memory versus detected memory"