>Hi,
>The iso_date function in fs/isofs/util.c doesn't correctly handle leap
>years.
>Well, it doesn't handle the year 2100 - which according to the code is a
>leap year, but according to the commonly accepted rules is not.
>I don't think we need to be to concerned right now, but changing:
> if (((year+2) % 4) == 0 && month > 2)
>to:
> if (((year+2) % 4) == 0 && month > 2 && year != 130) should
>fix it.
The equivalent code
if (!((year+2) & 3) && month > 2 && year != 130) is probably
faster. The somewhat expensive mod operator is
replaced by a bitwise "and", that is faster on most platforms.
Helge Hafting
-- ----------------------------------------------------------- helge.hafting@daldata.no -----------------------------------------------------------
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/