Re: Interesting scheduling times

Petko Manolov (petkan@varel.bg)
Thu, 17 Sep 1998 14:30:36 +0000

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Jukka Tapani Santala: "Re: [PATCH] Speeding up FAT operations"
Previous message: Jeanette Pauline Middelink: "Re: showstopper race condition in sync() ??? [2.1.119|120]"
Maybe in reply to: Richard Gooch: "Interesting scheduling times"
Next in thread: Petko Manolov: "Re: Interesting scheduling times"

Richard Gooch wrote:
>
> CPU process switch thread switch Kernel version
> Pentium 100 12 12 2.1.109
> PPro 180 8 4 2.1.122-pre2
> Pentium/MMX 200 4 2 2.1.104

I did a little different test on my pentium 166 MMX:

kernel 2.0.35 5us
kernel 2.1.121 6us
kernel 2.1.122 6us - 7us
kernel 2.1.122 9us (under X Windows???)

Petkan

-- Petko Manolov - petkan@varel.bg http://www.varel.bg/~petkan

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Jukka Tapani Santala: "Re: [PATCH] Speeding up FAT operations"
Previous message: Jeanette Pauline Middelink: "Re: showstopper race condition in sync() ??? [2.1.119|120]"
Maybe in reply to: Richard Gooch: "Interesting scheduling times"
Next in thread: Petko Manolov: "Re: Interesting scheduling times"