Re: STREAMS: interface versus implementation

Mike Jagdis (mike@roan.co.uk)
Thu, 17 Sep 1998 10:24:15 +0100 (GMT/BST)


On Wed, 16 Sep 1998, Albert D. Cahalan wrote:

> Theodore Y. Ts'o writes:
>
> > Does anyone know of any significant base of application code that
> > really does use Streams instead of a BSD Sockets-type interface?
>
> AFAIK it is used by boring business software. It's the stuff people
> might need, not the stuff people have fun with. Software that runs
> on gross systems like SCO OpenServer could be ported to Linux.

You are talking about TLI/XTI not STREAMS. Plenty of thickos
use TLI/XTI (often because a "manager" has decided it is "better"
- it isn't). Practically no one passes raw STREAMS message down
from an application unless they are talking to their own STREAMS
module that they ship with the app and that they have just pushed
on to the STREAMS head in question.

Mike

-- 
.----------------------------------------------------------------------.
|  Mike Jagdis                  |  Internet:  mailto:mike@roan.co.uk   |
|  Roan Technology Ltd.         |                                      |
|  54A Peach Street, Wokingham  |  Telephone:  +44 118 989 0403        |
|  RG40 1XG, ENGLAND            |  Fax:        +44 118 989 1195        |
`----------------------------------------------------------------------'

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/