Re: Old code in 2.1.x? Is UMSDOS pseudoroot planned for 2.2?

Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Wed, 16 Sep 1998 15:45:58 +0100 (BST)

> Is there a problem with drivers having been split early from the 2.0 tree and
> not getting the updates in 2.1 that they got in 2.0? Is this a "pick a driver
> and get to work" type of effort than I can help with, or are these covered in
> current freezes?

Donald Becker keeps most of his (and other peoples) drivers on
cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov. Propogating the ones in 2.0.36 (and others that
need updating) into the 2.1.x tree is something that needs work. Go ahead
and have fun doing it with the cards you posess.

There are probably other updates like that which haven't leaked back. 2.0.36pre
has a few scsi fixes that probably need pushing forward for example

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/