Is is planned to reimplement the pseudoroot code for UMSDOS for 2.2?
I just now tried to upgrade a small UMSDOS machine on my network to test out
2.1.121 and noticed the pseudoroot access was gone.
I've noticed a few drivers I use a lot in the 2.1 code have been taken from
old source trees. The Lance driver is v1.09 in 2.1.121 and v1.14 in 2.0.35.
It doesn't have module support any more in the 2.1 tree.
Is there a problem with drivers having been split early from the 2.0 tree and
not getting the updates in 2.1 that they got in 2.0? Is this a "pick a driver
and get to work" type of effort than I can help with, or are these covered in
current freezes?
- --- __
Kurt Fitzner <kfitzner@nexus.v-wave.com> |_/\
,--,;\)
PGP Fingerprint: 2B 4F 1B DE B9 2C 35 81 ,-"-..._\
(ID 0xD0CBC40D) 94 9E 0B 9A EF 4A 13 86 \_...._( )
|a a )|
"Those who don't write back are subject to /._ / /
my deeseenteegratore." \' ||\'
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0i
Charset: noconv
iQCVAwUBNf9GTb3GEEDQy8QNAQFBZwP9GlkU4119ZzOOnsbLIuvnMCVSrZFMDLEC
KhZGWPCzQFi7tfRC74UBdW/OA4sVDjWbOaQxyZfeE/xsTFb42UnE0ww8d6NN4QeI
6ZMzfPpHi3gXd2QCrcmWZHh9Kw8naRPhtmIuoSPXFLsUED4/Koo5kVOwjbeSRn5N
KKHSPK3AoKY=
=YkQC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/