> All,
>
> Did something slip in since about 2.1.120p2 which might suck CPU cycles?
> Kernel builds always required between 14:40 and 15:10 on a stable P150+
> box here. Starting with 2.1.120p3, this increased to a consistant 18:00+.
>
> Very repeatable. Not my imagination. And, no, no changes to system,
> compiler, nor binutils. This is run on local storage with no other system
> activity, ie. not NFS or network related.
>
> Steve
As a followup to my own post, I have verified a similar percentage of
slowdown on every box I own - including a dual PPro SMP machine which went
from a full build in ~4:40 to > 6 minutes. Something has definitely
caused a performance hit.
Please tell me I'm not the only person seeing this...
Steve
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/faq.html