I thought about that too. But when I looked at the assembler stuff of
set_gate() I didn't want mess with it. Is there really a need for doing
it in assembler ? Two wrapper functions unlock_idt() and lock_idt()
around _set_gate should also work, but gives some overhead, which shouldn't
be a problem.
> I'll write at least the basics for that to be possible, and hope that
> somebody with a dual Pentium can do the final details to make it all
> happy..
be my guest.
Thomas.
-- See, you not only have to be a good coder to create a system like Linux, you have to be a sneaky bastard too ;-) [Linus Torvalds in <4rikft$7g5@linux.cs.Helsinki.FI>]- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/faq.html