> Hi,
>
> I have seen the following changes to my system interrupts after moving from
> 2.1.117 to 2.1.118.
>
> IRQ CPU0 CPU1 Type Device
>
> 19: 23 24 IO-APIC-Level Intel EtherExpress Pro10/100 Ethernet
>
> to
>
> 9: 0 0 XT-PIC Intel EtherExpress Pro10/100 Ethernet
>
>
> Is this the desired behavior? If so, I don't see any interrupt requests in
> the new scheme of things for either CPU for the Ethernet card.
>
In "io_apic.c" comment out interrupt 9 at line #1180
there is a mix IMHO of IRQ 2 and IRQ 9
1163:void __init setup_IO_APIC(void)
1164:{
1165: init_sym_mode();
1166:
1167: /*
1168: * Determine the range of IRQs handled by the IO-APIC. The
1169: * following boards can be fully enabled:
1170: *
1171: * - whitelisted ones
1172: * - those which have no PCI pins connected
1173: * - those for which the user has specified a pirq= parameter
1174: */
1175: if ( ioapic_whitelisted() ||
1176: (nr_ioapic_registers == 16) ||
1177: pirqs_enabled)
1178: {
1179: printk("ENABLING IO-APIC IRQs\n");
1180: io_apic_irqs = ~((1<<2)| /*(1<<9)|*/ (1<<13));
1181: } else {
1182: if (ioapic_blacklisted())
Cheers,
Andre
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html