Re: 2.1.118 Tons of oopes

Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Sat, 29 Aug 1998 13:51:03 +0100 (BST)


> we're not simply a pointer pointing to a routine implementing the
> default action? (Does nothing if empty?) That way we wouldn't have
> to have a null pointer check on every call...

The socket code got changed to work that way for precisely the reason
given

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html