> Anyway, MY reason for proclaiming SMBFS to be silly, is this: Try it
> yourself!
>
> % cd WINDOWS # or any large directory
>
> % for i in 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10; do; echo * | wc -w; done
> 337
> 275
> 272
> 177
> 1
> 274
> 17
> 92
> 271
> 84
>
> Now, does this make ANY sense at all? I say it does not. And yes, I do
> have CONFIG_SMB_WIN95 turned on. The system "Windy" above is a Win98
> box.
>
> Does anyone have a system where this does NOT happen? I would be
> surprised to find anyone who can get a stable, repeatable directory
> listing which actually contains ALL files in a large directory.
Directory listings of any size work fine on WNT servers.
You might want to try _not_ using the w95 workarounds with w98; it's possible M$
may have fixed a few things.
Regards,
Bill
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html