Re: #define linux

Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Sun, 23 Aug 1998 13:32:07 +0100 (BST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: NFS: deterministic oops in nfs_file_close"
Previous message: Marc SCHAEFER: "Re: Small problem with malloc() tested on 2.1.117/115 (and maybe affecting others)"
In reply to: Philip Blundell: "Re: #define __linux__"
Next in thread: Philip Blundell: "Re: #define __linux__"

> >Now where is __linux__ set?? I can not find a singe define for this and
> >yet when I compile with the normal compiler its set.
>
> The compiler ought to define it automatically. If your cross compiler doesn't
> then it's broken.

That depends. If its a generic x86 cross compiler then its not broken. And
the fix is to either add -D__linux__ to the CFLAGS or to tweak the spec file
to define it.

Alan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: NFS: deterministic oops in nfs_file_close"
Previous message: Marc SCHAEFER: "Re: Small problem with malloc() tested on 2.1.117/115 (and maybe affecting others)"
In reply to: Philip Blundell: "Re: #define __linux__"
Next in thread: Philip Blundell: "Re: #define __linux__"

Re: #define __linux__

Re: #define linux