> On Fri, 21 Aug 1998, Ion Badulescu wrote:
> > My humble oppinion is that, with the scheduling change in 2.1.114, rpciod
> > will start running _before_ rpciod_up calls sleep_on() and therefore the
> > wake_up() call at the beginning of rpciod becomes ineffective because
> > nothing is sleeping on rpciod_idle yet. This is pure speculation, but it
> > kind of makes sense. I'm not sure what the right fix is though...
>
> This makes 100% sense, and explains why it was so timing-dependent and
> dependent on a scheduler change that should have made no difference at
> all.
>
> How does this patch work for you?
Works great, and it makes sense too. :-) Thanks a lot..
Ion
--
It is better to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool,
than to open it and remove all doubt.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html