Re: Sockets permanently in CLOSE_WAIT state.

Philippe Troin (phil@fifi.org)
Tue, 18 Aug 1998 00:45:21 -0700


Andy Sloane wrote:

> While hacking away at a project today I discovered a rather strange
> occurrence in a multithreaded environment using sockets. The jist of the
> problem is I was select()ing on a socket in one thread and at the same time
> closing it in another (yes, this is a design oversight on my part). To my
> surprise, after killing the server and all clients, the sockets remained in
> the CLOSE_WAIT state, yet no client processes were still running; I
> expected to at least see a thread stuck in a D state or something. It's
> not a 'normal' thing to do, but it's also something that an attacker could
> potentially use to run the system out of non-root sockets. Is this a known
> issue? (for the record I'm using linuxthreads.)

Reread your TCP books.
It's perfectly normal. Unless the sockets remain in CLOSE_WAIT more than say
15 minutes...
Anyone knows the 2MSL delay in Linux ?

Phil.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html