Re: kill -9 <pid of X>

Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Mon, 17 Aug 1998 13:02:35 +0100 (BST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Albert D. Cahalan: "Re: kill -9 <pid of X>"
Previous message: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: Death of init (Was: Re: kill -9 <pid of X>)"
In reply to: Rob Dale: "Re: 2.1.115 and Cyrix detection"
Next in thread: Jon M. Taylor: "Re: kill -9 <pid of X>"

> Perhaps you can explain how a userspace solution will drive a chip
> like the i740. If you prefer, think "Cyrix CPU with built-in video"
> and assume we have documentation. Don't forget the chipset-initiated

The i740 case is probably the good example, although its NDA'd to hell so
I wouldnt suggest an i740 based box for Linux at all.

The Cyrix built in video is interesting but kernel support doesn't seem
to be needed.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html

Next message: Albert D. Cahalan: "Re: kill -9 <pid of X>"
Previous message: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: Death of init (Was: Re: kill -9 <pid of X>)"
In reply to: Rob Dale: "Re: 2.1.115 and Cyrix detection"
Next in thread: Jon M. Taylor: "Re: kill -9 <pid of X>"