Re: kill -9 <pid of X>

Jon M. Taylor (taylorj@ecs.csus.edu)
Wed, 12 Aug 1998 13:50:39 -0700 (PDT)


On Wed, 12 Aug 1998, Alan Cox wrote:

> > Massive re-coding? Sounds like X just has to be protected from signal 9
> > just like init. That means you just need something to make X unique
> > to the kernel's signal "generator". Remember, you did not kill X, you
> > told the kernel to do it --- and it did.
>
> Or the kernel decided to blow it away, or I fed it stuff that crashed it
> solidly. There are many ways to upset the Xserver. (Thats not entirely
> an argument against any specific setup btw - no doubt kernel code would
> have some upset potential too)

Yes, but the difference if the kernel video drivers crash, I know
where to start looking. If X crashes and screws up the video card, the
video drivers *could* be the problem. But a whole lot of other things in
the X server could also be the problem. XFree86 4.0, which has separate
video driver libraries, should help clear this problem up a lot though.

Jon

---
'Cloning and the reprogramming of DNA is the first serious step in 
becoming one with God.'
	- Scientist G. Richard Seed

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html