Re: sigcontext vs. sigcontext_struct

H.J. Lu (hjl@lucon.org)
Wed, 12 Aug 1998 07:37:28 -0700 (PDT)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Jon Hamilton: "Re: kill -9 <pid of X>"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: NFS and setuid programs fails on 2.1"

>
> It seems that in /usr/include/asm/sig_context.h of kernel 2.1.51,
> "sigcontext" is defined while it was "sigcontext_struct" in 2.0.34.
> Since what version of Linux did we start to make this change? And
> what version of sigcontext would we eventually stick to in future
> kernels?
>

You may use glibc 2 and don't worry about it. Glibc is supposed to
hide those kernel stuff.

-- H.J. Lu (hjl@gnu.org)

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html

Next message: Jon Hamilton: "Re: kill -9 <pid of X>"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: NFS and setuid programs fails on 2.1"