Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???)

Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Fri, 7 Aug 1998 22:15:34 +0100 (BST)


> Depending on how USB is implemented under Linux, it may require a dynamic
> namespace that dev_fs can provide. Note that I did _not_ say that _only_
> dev_fs can provide this, but that it _can_. Currently, however, it is the
> _only_ solution that does provide this.

Fact:

Its not. PCMCIA does this all without dev_fs and has for ages. You don't
need dev_fs to do dynamic name spaces. Also dev_fs places the name space
management in the kernel which violates the great "policy in user space"
rule of Unix.

> Similarly, dev_fs may provide the groundwork for the next "great thing",
> perhaps the idea that Ted came up with re: volume names (which being a
> former NetWare admin *does* appeal to me greatly). But the simple fact is
> that dev_fs is here today, Ted's idea is not.

Fact:

It is UUIDs have been in ext2fs for a while

Otherwise carry on...

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html