Re: Antw: Re: CIPE - Encrypted IP Encapsulation

Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Fri, 7 Aug 1998 16:19:20 +0100 (BST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Kragen: "Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???)"
Previous message: Stephen Frost: "Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???)"
In reply to: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: [Fwd: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds]"
Next in thread: Kragen: "Re: Antw: Re: CIPE - Encrypted IP Encapsulation"

> I would certainly suggest to implement a plugin layer so people outside
> the US with it's totally braindead crypto-regulations would be able to
> use their own scheme.

Note that exporting a crypto plugin API from the US is also subject to
EAR (what was ITAR). Isnt life fun

Keep encryption in seperate apps like ssh

Alan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html

Next message: Kragen: "Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???)"
Previous message: Stephen Frost: "Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???)"
In reply to: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: [Fwd: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds]"
Next in thread: Kragen: "Re: Antw: Re: CIPE - Encrypted IP Encapsulation"