Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???)

Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH (allbery@kf8nh.apk.net)
Thu, 06 Aug 1998 17:08:28 -0300

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Joseph Malicki: "[Fwd: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds]"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds"
Maybe in reply to: Shawn Leas: "DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???)"
Next in thread: Mark Lord: "Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???)"

In message <Pine.LNX.3.96.980806004200.21118C-100000@labyrinth.logic.net>,
"Edw
ard S. Marshall" writes:
+-----
| Just to throw in a silly tidbit of info: the last time we spoke to the
| folks at Oracle, they didn't support >2G files on Solaris 2.6 yet. This
| was about two months ago. How long has 2.6 been out? (Actually, shouldn't
| 2.7 be released soonish?)
+--->8

2.6's >2GB "support" is absolutely minimal, to the point that it's
questionable whether there's sufficient support for Oracle to work with.

-- 
brandon s. allbery	[os/2][linux][solaris][japh]	 allbery@kf8nh.apk.net
system administrator	     [WAY too many hats]	   allbery@ece.cmu.edu
electrical and computer engineering
carnegie mellon university			   (bsa@kf8nh is still valid.)



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html

Next message: Joseph Malicki: "[Fwd: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds]"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds"
Maybe in reply to: Shawn Leas: "DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???)"
Next in thread: Mark Lord: "Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???)"