Re: gcc 2.7.1

Aaron Tiensivu (tiensivu@pilot.msu.edu)
Wed, 5 Aug 1998 18:04:37 -0400


> Do you have numbers for the effect of "-fno-strength-reduce"? Back when I
> added it I couldn't see any difference at all to any benchmarks, so I've
> had no real incentive to even try to remove it.

Although I haven't done a bunch of tests with the kernel, in general on ia32
boxes, it's actually produces better code because the i386 architecture is
so register-starved.. so, in general, -fno-strength-reduce produces better
code.

> Does anybody have any numbers that show that it actually matters for the
> kernel (I know it matters a lot for some other things, but I'm looking for
> something that really makes a difference in kernel-land)?

Someone else will have to pipe up for this one but for the general case, what
is in there now is best.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html