Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???)

Roderich Schupp (rsch@ExperTeam.de)
Wed, 5 Aug 1998 22:45:38 +0200


Chris Wedgwood <chris@cybernet.co.nz> said:
> Its got nothing to do with devFS. Its means I want to RW to a device
> without the buffer cache getting in the way.

> For many applications, this is a bad thing - but for large database
> which maintain their own caches, etc. it can be a big win.

This argument comes up again and again...
But in recent years I still have to see one Oracle installation
that puts the database on raw devices. Also I haven't heard any
figure quantifying this "big win" from any major vendor...

Just my 2c, Roderich

--
       Vinny: Is it possible, the two utes...
       Judge: Eh, the two what? Uh, uh, what was that word?
       Vinny: Uh, what word?
       Judge: Two what?
       Vinny: What?
       Judge: Uh, did you say 'Utes'?
       Vinny: Yeah, two utes.
       Judge: What is a ute?
       Vinny: Oh, excuse me, your honor. Two YOUTHS.

Roderich Schupp mailto:rsch@ExperTeam.de ExperTeam GmbH http://www.experteam.de/ Munich, Germany linux:2.1.114

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html