Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???)

Shawn Leas (sleas@ixion.honeywell.com)
Wed, 5 Aug 1998 16:59:24 -0500 (CDT)


On Wed, 5 Aug 1998, Chris Wedgwood wrote:

> Not that I advocate devfs, but there is no denying it does sidestep
> the issue quite nicely, but then again, there may be other
> alternatives not so closely tied to the kernel.

A stupid even uglier hack would be to populate a RD with the needed
devices... Actually, that's not uglier than /dev on magnetic media.

-Shawn
<=========== America Held Hostage ===========>
Day 2023 for the poor and the middle class.
Day 2042 for the rich and the dead.
899 days remaining in the Raw Deal.
<============================================>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html